Welcome to SECOND OPINION. Visit us if you are interested in the world of healthcare quality and the hard work of eliminating harm from our healthcare system. We'll talk about Pediatric healthcare (my first love) and surprising and innovative efforts from many quarters to reinfuse Medicine with the kind of Humanism and patient-centeredness that are the enduring legacy of our profession. My aim is to be relevant, practical, philosophical, occasionally outrageous but always worth the read!
Total Pageviews
Saturday, March 30, 2013
Getting to Zero Harm
“There’s nothing in the high reliability literature that demonstrates how to move a hospital or health system from low to high reliability in the real world,” according to Mark R. Chassin, MD, FACP, president of The Joint Commission and the Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare.
This is the second most challenging fact about patient safety in 2013. We have no roadmaps, other than those we invent and test ourselves. But the biggest obstacle is that it is hard for healthcare professionals to remember how lost we really are.
I have a love/hate relationship with the term "patient safety." We tend to think of it as getting from good to great, like Volvo building better airbags to protect passengers in case of a high speed crash. But there's a big difference. Automotive safety protects passengers from threats "out there" - bad weather, another driver's error. Patient safety is about protecting patients from the very healthcare we are providing. A closer analogy would be Volvo announcing that it has reduced the number of times its cars spontaneously catch fire and explode, noting with pride that their vehicles now do so a bit less often then those of their competitors. Imagine that.
That's how healthcare leaders have to see things if we are going to get to anywhere near zero harm from healthcare - making medication errors, hospital infections, "failure to rescue" events and wrong site surgeries problems of the past.
In a recent monograph on high reliability in healthcare by the American College of Healthcare Executives (Healthcare Executive, Mar/April 2013), the author pointed out that we need to aim for the total elimination of "defects" (which in our world means harm to patients) if we are to really move the bar. This admittedly flies in the face of "realistic" goal setting, given the difficulty of the work and our industry's track record to date.
How do we engage our professional workforce - physicians and nurses, pharmacists and therapists, from housekeepers to hospital administrators - in a sustained, heartfelt rejection of the status quo and the heavy lift of transforming the way we do...everything? As medical scientists, we like data. But it is clear that data, business intelligence, report cards - call them what you will - are not nearly enough. We need the human stories, and the closer to home the better. We need the spirit of renewal and a vision of the possibilities before us. And while on the topic of renewal and possibility, a happy Easter and Passover to all.
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Doctor please, not in front of the patient: interdisciplinary teamwork in healthcare
In today's New York Times,
oncology nurse and author Theresa Brown highlights the sometimes fraught and
always complicated relationship between physicians and nurses. By drawing
attention to the "hierarchical" interaction between these intertwined
but very separate professions, she exposes some weighty issues. These are
matters with real consequences - both for those who provide, and those who
consume contemporary, high-tech healthcare. I want to talk about what she
leaves out.
But first, here's what I think
this accomplished nurse is saying that physicians have to hear. Medicine, if it
was ever a solo act, isn't one anymore. The hospital is a dangerous
place. We need to "expect" one another to make slips and errors
- not so we can excuse ourselves, but so that we can see these events coming -
before they harm a patient, and help one another by heading them off.
This is the essence of teamwork on behalf of patient safety.
Changing the culture of an
organization is hard work, but changing that of a whole profession is like
steering an ocean liner. Where do we come from, as physicians? A
longstanding "culture of accountability" means that doctors expect
perfection of themselves and their colleagues. That they, alone, must
shoulder the burden of hard decisions. That making a mistake is not
merely a technical problem, but also a significant moral failure. We are
in many ways so different from our nursing colleagues that we have trouble
understanding one another. Physicians focus on the mechanisms of disease and
fixing what is broken. Nurses respond to the patient who owns the
disease, and that individual's overall needs. Hospital leaders expect
nurses, nowadays, to "stop the line" for safety. They rightly
complain that some of us physicians never go the memo.
On the other hand, many hospitals
and Health Systems like ours have embraced team training. We study and
practice the language and techniques of highly effective teams...we call
"huddles," we use checklists, and check backs and safe words that
mean "I think we have to pause and figure this out because we're not on
the same page." This is a framework adapted from aviation, nuclear power
and the military, and applied in the Emergency Department, Labor Suite and
Operating Room. It is slow work, but there is reason to believe that it
is stemming the tide of medical errors, a little at a time.
In her Times essay, “Healing the
Hospital Hierarchy,” Brown describes an intimating encounter with a senior
physician who “seethed” at her, eyeball to eyeball, when she proposed that a
bone marrow procedure be delayed until her patient’s potentially serious heart
problem could be evaluated. She adds
that “there is no established way for a nurse to resolve” such serious
concerns.
But here’s what Ms. Brown has left
out. First, escalation procedures in
many hospitals absolutely encourage and protect the professional who speaks
up. In fact, they demand as much. Second, intimidating behavior by any team
member is verboten. As a matter of fact, our Code of Conduct
refers to it in great detail. Physicians
in our facility have been disciplined for it and privileges have been
revoked.
Finally, mutual understanding
must be, well, mutual. What
I mean is that just as doctors need to understand the nurse’s role and hear her perspective, so nurses need to appreciate that most physicians, like most
nurses, really ARE there for the patient and that they are committed to doing
the right thing. Therein lies the path
to real teamwork – respect all around, and the patient at the center.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)